Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, and this makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes Vape Shop to get away from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.